Never had a call from the Ombudsman? Should you still review your WR affairs?
When it comes to workplace compliance, if you fall short of your obligations it may not have an impact in the short term. Often we are told by clients that they have never had a problem with a disgruntled employee of any contact whatsoever from the FWO. When considering a WR review, it is easy to see why some businesses can take the attitude of “if it aint broke, don’t fix it”. For businesses in who have never had a call or email from the ombudsman, we asked Senior WR Consultant Jason Norrie why a Workplace Relations Review is so essential.
Please see below for a full transcript of this video
Share the HR or workplace relations challenge facing your business and one of our experienced consultants will be in touch within 24 hours with a strategic action plan or discover the best strategy yourself by accessing out free online training library.
Transcript
00:00:00:08 – 00:00:03:24
So when it comes to workplace
00:00:03:24 – 00:00:07:14
compliance, if you fall short of your obligations,
00:00:07:20 – 00:00:11:26
one of the things that we’re very cognizant of is
00:00:11:29 – 00:00:16:02
it may not even impact you or your business in the short term.
00:00:16:16 – 00:00:20:03
So often we’re told by clients that they really never had a problem
00:00:20:03 – 00:00:24:07
with a disgruntled employee or any contact
00:00:25:00 – 00:00:27:25
or audits from the Fair Work Ombudsman.
00:00:28:10 – 00:00:33:22
So when considering a workplace relations review, I think it’s really easy to see
00:00:33:22 – 00:00:39:01
why some businesses will take the attitude of if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
00:00:39:19 – 00:00:43:17
So what would you say to a business who’s never had a call
00:00:43:17 – 00:00:46:29
or an email from the ombudsman or a challenging employee
00:00:46:29 – 00:00:50:10
dispute?
00:00:50:16 – 00:00:53:03
Well, that’s where the term the rainy day
00:00:53:03 – 00:00:57:10
policies sort of do come in play If a business hasn’t got
00:00:58:09 – 00:00:58:26
policies and
00:00:58:26 – 00:01:02:00
procedures in which it operates under,
00:01:02:29 – 00:01:07:16
they could be setting unfair precedents from case A to case B
00:01:08:12 – 00:01:16:01
they could manage with their first issue, just winging it through the process,
00:01:16:07 – 00:01:18:19
maybe getting it right, maybe getting close to the point.
00:01:19:06 – 00:01:21:26
But then they could get to the second process and do it completely different.
00:01:22:07 – 00:01:25:29
That second case actually then has a contest for procedural
00:01:25:29 – 00:01:30:17
fairness about, well, how come Person A was treated differently to person B?
00:01:31:05 – 00:01:34:14
Did A business have policies in place and therefore did they follow them?
00:01:35:16 – 00:01:37:17
Which is that common point of procedural fairness.
00:01:38:07 – 00:01:43:15
A good handbook is to set the scene of what an employee should be
00:01:43:15 – 00:01:47:16
and how they how that good employee should be operating
00:01:49:03 – 00:01:53:00
and keeping it down to the basics of the pieces of the fair Work Act.
00:01:53:12 – 00:01:57:10
If a business then wants to go into how to do manuals or operation manuals,
00:01:57:18 – 00:02:00:15
how to do your job, or your position descriptions,
00:02:00:23 – 00:02:04:19
then they should be kept different again from the policy manual
00:02:05:06 – 00:02:08:22
in a separate operations manual, separate job descriptions, and again,
00:02:08:28 – 00:02:12:18
all of these outside of the contract because business needs to change,
00:02:12:18 – 00:02:16:04
business needs to evolve, and businesses should review their policies yearly
00:02:16:23 – 00:02:19:18
especially in consultation with their employees.
00:02:19:18 – 00:02:22:14
There was one case that I did go through with the client where
00:02:23:27 – 00:02:25:26
they done everything by their policy.
00:02:25:26 – 00:02:27:19
They implemented their policy.
00:02:27:19 – 00:02:29:19
They told their employees when they first started,
00:02:29:24 – 00:02:32:23
but three years later, they had a sexual harassment case.
00:02:33:10 – 00:02:36:17
The business was found partly liable
00:02:36:17 – 00:02:40:07
at the end because, yes, they had the policies in place, but
00:02:40:25 – 00:02:43:23
they hadn’t refreshed their employees knowledge on the policy.
00:02:44:14 – 00:02:46:10
It was implemented three years ago.
00:02:46:10 – 00:02:49:16
A lot of the staff have been there a lot longer than that policy
00:02:49:16 – 00:02:52:19
and there’s no sort of rework on modern
00:02:52:19 – 00:02:53:20
reviews of that.
00:02:53:20 – 00:02:59:01
So the business could have done more in its powers to prevent that from happening?
00:02:59:07 – 00:03:01:29
If they did a couple of workshops with revisions throughout the year,
00:03:02:22 – 00:03:04:06
at least once a year
00:03:04:06 – 00:03:07:05
on their policies, procedures in toolbox talks and things like that.
00:03:07:18 – 00:03:11:23
So having policies is that protection piece
00:03:12:02 – 00:03:16:01
that a business can go through challenges when it hits them,
00:03:16:12 – 00:03:19:27
as well as ensure consistency throughout their procedures.
00:03:20:03 – 00:03:22:19
And again, ensuring they’re meeting their workplace
00:03:23:22 – 00:03:26:22
obligations as best possible.
00:03:26:24 – 00:03:27:24
Yeah.
00:03:28:02 – 00:03:30:25
The other piece on a piece on that is
00:03:31:04 – 00:03:33:10
when it comes to more of the compliance side
00:03:33:11 – 00:03:37:03
so moving away from the policies & procedures when it comes to minimum rates
00:03:37:03 – 00:03:41:09
when it comes to award coverage, etcetera, I think that
00:03:41:18 – 00:03:44:18
even if you don’t do the work right now
00:03:44:18 – 00:03:47:10
and you have not had a call from the Fair Work Ombudsman,
00:03:47:19 – 00:03:51:10
when there is a call from the Fair Work Ombudsman and you’ve got it wrong,
00:03:52:16 – 00:03:55:25
the issue or the amount that you maybe
00:03:55:25 – 00:03:59:02
may potentially be liable for compounds,
00:03:59:02 – 00:04:03:01
I think there’s a 6 year liability period.
00:04:03:01 – 00:04:04:01
Is that right?
00:04:04:01 – 00:04:06:15
Statute of limitations is for up to six years.
00:04:07:08 – 00:04:10:11
Basically the powers in which
00:04:10:11 – 00:04:14:02
the ombudsman can investigate an underpayment of claim
00:04:14:04 – 00:04:17:03
for the underpayment, claim for the employee.
00:04:18:05 – 00:04:18:24
And if
00:04:18:24 – 00:04:23:02
you navigate that or manage that yourself, an employee could technically
00:04:23:02 – 00:04:27:02
ask you to look at ten years if you would do that internally.
00:04:27:02 – 00:04:30:04
But if it went through to the Ombudsman, that would be in the statute
00:04:30:04 – 00:04:31:24
on the six years.
00:04:31:29 – 00:04:35:13
So it’s really important that, okay, well you’ve got things in place
00:04:35:13 – 00:04:37:19
and you may think things are sound for now, but
00:04:38:08 – 00:04:41:10
have they been always been sound and are they always
00:04:41:20 – 00:04:44:08
or are they going to remain sound with the changes?
00:04:45:08 – 00:04:49:23
National minimum wage went up the highest it’s ever gone up in the last ten years.
00:04:49:23 – 00:04:52:27
12 years, sorry, from the Fair Work Act.
00:04:52:27 – 00:04:54:26
And we’re probably going to look at another big increase
00:04:54:26 – 00:04:57:16
next year, not as big as the 5.2%
00:04:57:26 – 00:05:02:13
for the lower sectors of the wages and 4.6% in the awards.
00:05:02:22 – 00:05:05:07
But it still might be quite another big one.
00:05:05:07 – 00:05:09:08
So if people are above reward or if they are wrong, classification
00:05:09:20 – 00:05:13:00
or if they’re under the wrong award, the salaries
00:05:13:09 – 00:05:15:22
that people are getting may come under fire
00:05:16:14 – 00:05:20:24
and might be a lot closer to being on minimum wage than you think they are.
00:05:22:14 – 00:05:23:12
And I think
00:05:23:15 – 00:05:27:26
the point really to drive home here is not only that the six year
00:05:28:07 – 00:05:31:07
statute of limitations that Jason just covered,
00:05:31:22 – 00:05:37:03
but if you make a wrong assessment regarding a pay rate
00:05:37:14 – 00:05:39:18
or award classification,
00:05:40:05 – 00:05:43:25
not only can the ombudsman go back six years,
00:05:44:04 – 00:05:48:20
but multiply that by five, ten, 15, 20 employees.
00:05:48:20 – 00:05:52:08
However many employees are impacted by this assessments,
00:05:52:17 – 00:05:55:23
it really drives home to me
00:05:55:23 – 00:05:58:27
the importance of this workplace relations review.
00:05:58:27 – 00:06:03:28
It’s better to do the hard work upfront rather than face the compounded
00:06:03:28 – 00:06:07:12
or potential compounded ramifications at a later date.